By Chris McGarry
If there is one topic of conversation your average Joe Canuck takes pleasure in discussing over a cup of Tim Horton’s coffee (besides hockey) it’s the fact that we’re not American.
Despite months of unending snow and cold and short summers plagued by hazy, mosquito–filled skies, we in the Great White North have it pretty darn good: a health care system that’s the envy of the world, a generous social safety net, education that’s second to none and, in contrast to our wild, unhinged cousins to the south, a peaceful, orderly, progressive utopia where one needs guns to protect the lives of themselves or their loved ones.
And one way we frostbitten, beer–swillin’, hockey–mad hosers vehemently wear our always not–so–subtle anti–Americanism on our sleeve is by distancing ourselves from the gun culture that has become so pervasive in the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.
Readers with anti-gun tendencies eager to dismiss this commentary as senseless, extreme–right drivel really should take time from their busy lives to dust off the history books and learn the truth about what various Liberal and Red Tory governments, the media and leftwing academia have been lying about for decades – that the right to keep and bear arms is not exclusively an American liberty.
What!!! you say? That’s preposterous! There is no right to bear arms in Canada. Never has been. Never will be. The basis of our ancient English common law rights, the Magna Carta, established in 1215, enshrined the right of freemen to keep and bear arms for the defense of their homes and the nation.
Flash forward almost five centuries later to 1689. For the better part of fifty years, a continuous succession of internal conflicts destabilized England, which had been governed, albeit unsuccessfully, as a republic from 1649 – 1660.
Though sympathetic to the Monarchy, our ancestors persevered to severally limit the power of the King and fought to place even stronger protections on their ageless freedoms. This brought about the English Bill of Rights (where America’s founding fathers derived the Second Amendment), a revision of our first great constitution, which unequivocally states: “Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence”.
Okay, so times have changed – just a bit. But I’m quite sure Catholics as well as non–Christians and even atheists are just as capable of exercising their God–given/natural rights as are their Protestant counterparts.
This right (which Lord William Blackstone declared to be ‘absolute’ in his commentaries on English law) was carried prominently into our nation’s rich heritage by way of the British North America Act, forever preserved during the signing of Confederation in 1867.
While it may be true when former prime minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau repatriated the Canadian constitution in 1982, the great legal minds of the era forgot to (or did they?) incorporate the long–standing right of gun ownership – overtly, at least. Not to worry though, because it can be found under Section 26, which states: “Certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada.”
In this day and age of legislated liberties, the concept of natural rights – especially in many westernized nations (not just Canada) – has become as foreign as arranged marriages and genital mutilation.
Too often, people merely accept government-made laws that violate the very inalienable rights every man, woman and child on this planet is born with – the most important of which includes the right to own arms for self–defense, free expression the right to own property.
In April 2012, Prime Minister Stephen Harper took a small though significant step towards restoring our ancient freedoms by dismantling the much–maligned long gun registry. In spite of this small victory, we have yet to gain the high ground with regards to reestablishing gun ownership as an inherent right in our society, as opposed to a mere ‘privilege’ given or taken away at the whim of a distant, faceless firearms bureaucracy.
It has been said time and again that individuals who don’t know their rights technically don’t have any. Perhaps it’s high time we as a society became less complacent and more familiar with our natural rights and vigorously oppose those politicians and bureaucrats who so callously wish to extinguish them.
Because, at the end of the day, the only rights we truly have are the ones we are willing to fight for.
Designed to Fail is a 45-page Special Report which explains, in detail, everything that’s wrong with Canada’s Firearm Prohibition Order system, then outlines a clear plan to fix it.
The only question is… Will the federal government take the action required to keep Canadians safe?
Or will they continue to pay lip service to Public Safety while doing nothing to stop violent, repeat offenders from illegally obtaining guns?
Author
-
Christopher di ArmaniChristopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.
The right to self defense in not an “American” thing. It’s wired into the DNA of every creature with a heart beat. It is(arguably)the most primal instinct in nature..ALL nature. And in a day and age where criminals can and do get their hands on any and every type of weapon, why should anyone be able to tell any of us whether we can or can’t defend ourselves and our families on equal terms? No it’s not an American thing…it’s a human thing.
It’s natural law.
Yep
Yessir!!
My cat exercises that right when he feels in danger. He also knows how to use progressive force. Are people more stupid than my cat?
Is there any real traction with this? Is anyone stepping up to base for us? Are Canadians just SOL and forever at the mercy of our Law Enforcement and Criminals? One thinks itself above the law and the other acts outside of it. We poor bastards whom obey it are left with nothing.
Will we ever see the light?
Well, for any idea to gain traction it takes individuals taking action to ensure it does. I would encourage you to write your MP/MLA and explain your position on this issue to them. Then send me a copy of the letter and I”ll post it here. The more of us who make our voices known the better.
Only when a politician realizes that NOT doing something will cost him/her an election will they take action. That’s their nature, so let’s work with that. 🙂
Those of us who have respect for the law are not “poor bastards”. Our laws, enacted in the name of the Crown, are our legal protection against both Royal and democratic usurpation of those rights.
travis macintyre
14/06/2013
To: [email protected]
Picture of travis macintyre
Mr Rafferty:
My name is Travis MacIntyre and I am a resident of Fort Frances, ON.
I would like to express my opinion to you about gun control. I am a law abiding citizen, and while I do not currently own a firearm, I am looking to purchase one very soon. I was very glad to see the long gun registry scrapped. It happened way too late and never should have been started in the first place, as the huge sums of money that were spent could have been much better spent elsewhere, such as education, health care, hiring more police officers or KEEPING DANGEROUS CRIMINALS BEHIND BARS and not have them let out after ridiculously short prison terms only to recidivate. It is of my opinion that the handgun registry should be scrapped as well, and along with it, the need for responsible, law abiding handgun owners to have to go blind filling out paper work every time they want to go to the range to compete or for leisure. Criminals intent on obtaining firearms, and using firearms in the commission of crimes are quite frankly NOT going to jump through all the legal hoops the rest of us are forced to do. Gun registry does not stop criminals who obtain firearms illegally. It only punishes the law abiding.
It sickens me that here in Canada, that we have a justice system that would rather make an example of a man like Ian Thompson who’s only “crime” was defending his life and property from being destroyed, rather than the perpetrators who TRIED TO BURN DOWN HIS HOUSE WITH HIM IN IT! But because he responded to that threat with a firearm, even though he shot no one, crown prosecutors tried to hang him.
It is for that and other reasons, that I ask you to support the right of law abiding citizens to enjoy their shooting sports and hunting without all the undue and unnecessary paperwork and expense that is incurred, by advocating to repeal the handgun registry and the ATT. I also ask you to support the right of Canadians to be able to protect themselves (all threats, man or beast) by advocating for individuals, who so choose, the right to carry a handgun or other firearms. There is a proven statistical correlation between being allowed to carry and conceal, and lower incidence of violent crimes, in areas of the United States that allow it. To put it bluntly, if i were the type of person who liked to mug people, or break into peoples houses, or rob a store, I would be more inclined to do so here in Canada, as I would say, in Texas. Canadians are in general, much easier targets for violent crime, because the criminals know that basically only police officers, and now CBSA officers, carry weapons.
Thank you.
Sincerely: Travis MacIntyre
if there was a petition to sign I d sign it.
I totally agree with your comments they are true and factual We have to start some sort of group to get this point across
Hello Christopher,
I like your article. Maybe the NRA would find value in promoting and defending this idea in Canada if it represented more membership for their organization. Their clout and legal teams would certainly help the effort move forward. We need this to move forward, quickly.
Work, people. Push it forward.
The NRA Constitution and Bylaws do not allow them to work outside the United States. They can share information but their lobbying efforts are restricted to protecting and defending American rights and freedoms.
Canadians (or citizens of any other nation) are welcome to join the NRA but the only benefit is information, not political action in those countries.
February 8, 2020
I feel the same way as many of you here do. I have for years explained and promoted that the USA Constitution was in fact based on the BNA, the Magna Carta and Sect. 26 of the Canadian Constitution. The USA was smart backing up their 1st Amendment with the 2nd.
If you wish to support 2.5 million + Canadians who have and use firearms, then join the CSSA, or NFA or CCFR and GOC…more info if you search each on the Web. I belong to the first 2 plus NRA member-at-large. Yes, effective gun control has been clearly shown to us before in history…Hitler, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Ho Chi Minh, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot, Hirohito, Castro etc. you get the idea. So now it seems the over zealous liberal left is about to add the Trudeau name (Father & Son) to the mix.
Bill C-71 and Orders In Council etc. Time to get involved, write letters, emails, petitions and speak out..or as it has been said before…”OUTLAW GUNS AND ONLY OUTLAWS WILL HAVE THEM”.
Freedom is not given Freely to Mankind. It must be Fought For, Protected and Defended at all times. God gives us the Inalienable Right to Be Free and Humans Often Give it Up to Other Humans. We are Free to Defend Our Freedom…There are no LAWS TO STOP THAT. NEVER FORGET THAT!
Right about the NRA. I’m a lifetime member of that great organization and I wish the various Canadian groups, NFA, CSSA, CCFR would come together as one to be more effective but as we know canuckistan doesn’t work that way. Too bad.
I’m a canucklehead born and bred but half of the stuff that goes on in this country makes me sick to my stomach. Two billion wasted on the long gun reg? The right to bear arms left out of canada’s “constitution”. Defend yourself/family with a gun and you’ll probably get charged criminally for it. The USA is a better country than canuckistan will ever be. I think canada’s days are numbered, if it doen’t break apart with the West going its own way it is going to become another Argentina. I detest canada now.
DITTO
It is wrong to detest Canada. Nationally and in many provinces we have bad political leadership, but there are exceptions: Alberta, for one. I am nearly 70 and grew up in Cape Breton before moving to BC. I learned to shoot in Nova Scotia, with the cub scouts and Boy Scouts. Our scoutmaster was a hunter and brought his rifles in from time to time so we could safely familiarize ourselves with them. Even some of my ten and twelve year old friends had their own .410/.22 over and unders, which without supervision we could take out into the woods that surrounded our town. Redneck parents? No. My best friend at the time was a doctor’s son.
Hell, when I was a kid there was no gun crime. Most families owned a few riffles and a shotgun or two. That was normal. I don’t know any kid in those days who got shot or shot anybody else. Anyone with Scout training was fully capable of understanding the responsibility of using firearms, and also capable of helping defend the family if that was required. No wonder the PC crowd had to get rid of the Scouting movement.
My wife and I are life members of both Canada’s National Firearms Association and the American National Rifle Association. Both provide excellent magazines and online publications that are worth reading. Our thinking is that the American NRA will be the last bastion of firearms ownership: when it goes down there is no organization on the planet left to support the flame of legal firearms ownership. We hope the Canadian National Firearms Association can match the influence and longevity of the American NRA. We both look upon our skills in teaching about firearms and if necessary using them in support of the Crown. We most certainly don’t want to be Americans, but we see no reason not to work with them where our interests overlap. Our most important firearms battle in Canada is to preserve our firearms rights despite the Cuban kid’s drive to disarm Sovereign Canadians. Nothing Turdo says or does supports a Sovereign Canada where legal concerns flow from the Queen of England, not from some Cuban Frog.
Actually, Canadians rights to self defense and to bear arms are enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in Section 7, which states “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person, and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”
Yes I like your article. I believe the right to keep and bear arms is a God given right, not a Magna Carta or constitution right. Whatever a constitution can give it can take away. Speaking about constitutions, where’s ours? As far as I can see CANADA does not have one. The Charter of Rights is not a constitution. A Charter is the by laws of a corporation. CANADA is a corporation. It’s corp # 000023098 is registered with Edgar Securities in Washington DC. So quite possibly the consititution of the United States of America is our constitution. That puts us squarely under the 2nd Amendment.
However, constitution or not, a God given right to keep and bear arms for sustenance, defence of self and family and protection of property cannot be enfringed or adrogated by no man made government. A right is not a privilege. Take it up with the Creator God Almighty who gave us the right to life and the protection of that life. There should never even be a discussion on it.
Respectfully, Canada is listed as a Government, not a registered corporation. Corporations can only be created by the Monarch, through the provinces or federal government. (quick pivot, the 10 provinces have never federated into one gov’t called Canada – but that is for another time). The U.S. cannot create a corporation called CANADA for us. And the Securities cannot create corporations either. The federal gov’t is however, what is known as a body politic, and in that sense shares many characteristics of a corporation – it exists year after year, members come and go, but the body continues. And yes a ‘body’ is a fiction. One cannot ‘touch’ Parliament or the gov’t. But that is completely different from saying that CANADA is an actual corporation, similar for example, to Coca Cola. I hope this briefly clarifies this issue.
Your article will open many eyes.It opened mine. I will forward this to all my firearms friends. But, as firearms owners we all have to band together. There is far too much infighting between long arms owners and handgun owners. The fact is that we are all firearms owners and we should be supporting each other in order to keep our firearms to enjoy our sport. No one type of firearm is responsible for the draconian laws the liberals impose on us. So if you want to keep your firearms and and enjoy our sport it’s time to get the liberals out of office.. 2.5 million of us should be able to do just that. End of story.
“While it may be true when former prime minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau repatriated the Canadian constitution in 1982.”
“Why did PM Trudeau in 1982 have his Liberal government create the “Canada Act” and then take that act to a foreign Monarch and have her parliament pass that act as the “Constitution Act, 1982” if Canada confederated 115 years earlier and was a sovereign nation?”
He did no such thing. What he did was a fraud. Canada has the legal status of a ship at sea under Admiralty Law. Canada was never Confederated.
So… here are 10 very important questions that you need to ask yourself:
1- Where are the Articles of Confederation, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and was a sovereign nation?
2- Why was Canada known as the “Dominion of Canada,” a British colony until 1931, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and was a sovereign nation?
3- Why in 1867 was the BNA Act created to be Letters Patent for a Governor General to the Dominion of Canada if Canada had confederated and was a sovereign nation?
4- Why in 1893, would the British Parliament deem it necessary to repeal certain sections of the BNA act, with the “Statute Law Revisions Act” if Canada confederated in 1867 and was a sovereign nation?
5- Why in 1931 would the British parliament create the “Statute of Westminster” to nullify the Dominion of Canada, if Canada confederated in 1867 and was a sovereign nation?
6- Why in 1946 did a foreign Monarch, King George VI appoint a representative for the UK, a Governor General and then command the Parliament of Canada to create Letters Patent in 1947 for his Governor General, if Canada confederated in 1867 and was a Sovereign Nation?
7- Why did PM Trudeau in 1982 have his Liberal government create the “Canada Act” and then take that act to a foreign Monarch and have her parliament pass that act as the “Constitution Act, 1982” if Canada confederated 115 years earlier and was a sovereign nation?
8- Why do Prime Ministers and other officials when sworn into office here in Canada, swear their allegiance to a foreign monarch, Queen Elizabeth, and not the people of Canada if Canada confederated in 1867 and was a sovereign nation?
9- Why in 1947 did Canadian Citizenship come into existence if Canada confederated 80 years earlier and was a sovereign nation?
10- Why was it necessary in 1990 to sue a member of the federal parliament, J. Littlechild MP, to force him to do his duty to his constituents and have the courts rule against his constituents, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and was a sovereign Nation?
https://www.themythiscanada.com/
Queen Elizabeth is not a “foreign monarch’, she actually “owns” Canada as a colony. Canadian Sovereignty flows from the British Crown, as does Australia and New Zealand. I don’t have a problem with that, in fact I rather like the idea, especially given the history of “republics” in our world. I just wish the Queen would take a more “hands on” approach. If she ever needs a hand, I’m solidly on her side.
The people of Canada should have the right to defend themselves and defend their property because the government is lying to them when they say they will keep us safe when we all know from what happened in nova Scotia that the police are incapable of protecting us and if we were able to defend ourselves maybe what happened could have been stopped much earlier and not take away our god given rights for self preservation. The government is more worried about the criminals rights than they are the rights of the people who put them there, the average person doesn’t have their own security detail watching them 24 hours a day like the p.m. does
So if I am to understand what is proposed the present Government is saying that they will not tolerate anyone who defends themselves or loved ones and are willing to take away our ability to even the playing field and take away , at this point , any tool to do so. They are saying that your life is not worth the political football they seemingly enjoy throwing around. I ask again why do they want these statistically irrelevant tools taken out of the hands of the law abiding? Public safety is compromised when the only one’s with the ability to own arms, use them and then be set free due to a backwards judicial system are the criminals. The ones who cry about people owning FA’s are already privileged and sheltered in a bubble of hypocrisy. Lies seem to be the new norm.
So here’s a question, let’s say the protestant right to bear arms does indeed apply to modern Canada. Does it spell out clearly that we are allowed any arms we see fit? Does it even specify guns? Could it Instead be argued that allowing us a knife or bow counts? Does it say firearms without restrictions?
Of course Canadians have the Right to self defence. The more “multi-cultural” Canada becomes the more important is that right. Deal with the threat first and let the Courts make a fool of themselves if they don’t support that Right.
Let’s look at the bigger picture. Anyone that takes something from another by means of theft, manipulation, or greed etc. clearly suffers from some sort of mental Heath issue. We should not behave as if we are part of the food chain. Deal with Mental Heath and stop referring civilized humans as weapons and those with issues as victims.
Very accurate article, but the right to bear arms in Canada according to the Magna-Carta and Common law, goes much deeper than stated. What is now Canada has always had the least gun control or the Americas, up until the 1970ls when evidence based gun control laws were replaced by American style populist driven gun control.
In the 17-1800’s Free trade in Firearms with first nations shaped Canada, and reshaped the relationships and power balance of all first nations in the Americas.
Later in the 1930’s the US came out with broad firearms bans around the same time Hitler, and other European “Progressives” were doing the same. Canada when it’s own way, understanding and respecting the role firearms had always played in Canada, the government came our with targeting restrictions on the ownership of Handguns, that represented almost all the criminal use of firearms. While the US banned things like full auto machine guns, Canada did not, crime rates went up un the US much faster than they did in Canada, and it wasen’t until Trudeau-mania reshaped Candian justice that populist driven rhetoric, like that in the US began to drive Candian gun control, those first few years of this style of gun control seen the fastest rise in violent crime in Canadian history. (1970’s)
I was born and raised in NW Quebec, we just always had guns and I got my hunting and fishing license when I was 12 years old. Years later a friend of mine passed away and gave me his car and a 410 single shot gun. Years later I moved and had my gun shipped with me out west. My ex bf registered my gun when the gun registry was in place. I told him no and he did not listen to me anyhow. Well we split up and he will not give me my rifle back. My best friend’s fiance is livid that he has not given it back to me. He said it is under his name now, and that I do not use it anyhow and that I cannot but shells for it anyhow because I do not have a PAL. I do not have proof that it is mine either as these things were given to me verbally before he passed of cancer. So do I chalk this up to a loss? I have a feeling it is a loss cause.
I’ll never comprehend why some people feel the need to be vindictive jerks when a relationship ends. Sadly, I think you may have to chalk this one up as a loss.
Pity you don’t have a PAL though, because I’m sure we could find someone willing to donate a replacement to you in no time. Wouldn’t have the same sentimental value, obviously, but it would be something.