• Home
  • About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Gun Laws 101
  • FPO Violators
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Hire Me

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Personal Responsibility
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice Denied
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Canadian Mass Murders
    • Firearm Prohibition Orders
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Racism
    • Restraining Orders
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Guns
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Firearms Act
    • Fun Gun Stuff
    • Gun Control
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Target Shooting Competitions
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Police
    • Abuse of Police Authority
    • Filming Police
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Hall of Shame
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Political Antics
    • Political Corruption
    • Social Justice
    • Stupid Human Tricks
    • Union Bay Improvement District
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Property Rights
    • Privacy Rights
    • Self-Defense
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure

Pedophiles Rights? Over my dead body…

Published October 18, 2011 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Politically Correct Madness


Pedophiles are fighting for “the same rights as homosexuals.”  They claim they are being discriminated against because of their “sexual orientation” and that sexually desiring children is not a crime but is instead a legitimate activity; that they are not sick, disgusting criminals but simply “minor-attracted people.”

You can dress it up with as many pretty names as you like, but anyone having sex with children is a perverted, disgusting and repulsive criminal who needs to be treated as such, not coddled because they are “misunderstood.”

Naturally, a couple of Canadian [so-called] psychologists have declared that pedophilia is a “sexual orientation… just like… homosexuality.”

Was Hubert Van Gijseghem simply trying to rationalize his own criminal desires when he said the following to members of Canada’s Parliament?

“True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent.”

Which is precisely why we place these criminals in jail cells… to aid them in remaining abstinent.

Before that same Parliamentary committee Dr. Vernon Quinsey promoted the same notion, even while describing the children who pedophiles would have sex with as “victims” and the “minor-attracted individuals” who have sex with children as “offenders.”  I guess he was just being a little misunderstood himself, right?

Let me just make some distinctions for you. First of all, pedophiles are people who prefer prepubescent children. They’re not interested in 15-year-olds who have an adult body shape or anything like that. They’re not interested in those kinds of people. They have quite a restricted area of sexual interests in terms of the kinds of body types that their victims have. There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else. Treatment for those offenders shades into management, where you essentially have to teach someone to live within their sexual preference structure. They have to find other kinds of outlets. They have to avoid high-risk situations. They have to do all those sorts of things. But I think that most people would agree that this kind of sexual preference pattern—an actual preference for prepubertal children—is not alterable by any kinds of current treatments.

 

As absurd as this notion is, it’s gaining traction in supposedly rational circles.  Harvard Health Publications wrote for example, in their July 2010 edition that,

“Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and unlikely to change. Treatment aims to enable someone to resist acting on his sexual urges.”

 

It is commonly agreed that pedophiles and other sex offenders are highly unlikely to change.  I don’t think anyone is disagreeing over that fact.  Where the disagreement comes in is between folks like me who believe that sex crimes against children are just that… CRIMES… and those who would make any and all excuses for those poor, misunderstood sex offenders… er I mean “minor-attracted individuals” whose “sexual orientation” just means they like to screw little kids, not adults.

Okay…

But I wouldn’t go testing that theory with any children of God-fearing, gun-owning Christians…

Remember that BC judge who ruled back in the late 1980’s that the 34-year-old man who raped a 3-year-old child should be given a conditional discharge, and I quote, “because the child was sexually aggressive“?

Yes,that’s right.  Judge Peter van der Hoop actually said that the 3-year-old girl was at fault for her rape at the hands of a drunken 34-year-old man.

Judge van der Hoop disappeared shortly after that ruling, never to be heard from again.  Good thing, because I’m sure I wasn’t the only one asking myself this question:

“Who’s Judge van der Hoop screwing and how many years is it until that kid’s 10th birthday?”


Hey, here’s an idea…
why don’t some of you “minor-attracted” folks try out your attraction with Ted Nugent’s grandkids…  I’d PAY to see how that works out for you!

And as for my grandkids… all I will say is this:

“Good luck with that.”

 

*** My thanks to Don Laird for tracking down the name of that asinine judge for me.  ***

 

Author

  • Christopher di Armani
    Christopher di Armani

    Christopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: child molesters, Dr. Vernon Quinsey, Hubert Van Gijseghem, Judge Peter van der Hoop, minor-attracted people, pedophiles, sexual orientation

Did you find value in this article?

If you found this article useful or it contained valuable information and you want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee or two.

1. Send an Interac eTransfer to author @ christopherdiarmani.net (remove spaces)

2. Send via PayPal using this link: https://www.paypal.me/ThatLibertyGuy

3. Use your credit card in my online store to support me with a one-time donation, a monthly recurring donation, or an annual donation. See these links for all the details about the thank-you gifts I offer my supporters.

Comments

  1. Don Laird says

    October 19, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Excellent article Christopher…

    I am curious, which judge was it who accepted the argument that a 3 year old child was “sexually aggressive”

    Regards, Don Laird
    Edson, Alberta, Canada

    Reply
    • Christopher di Armani says

      October 19, 2011 at 4:23 pm

      I’m trying to dig that up. I used to have that stored away years ago, but can’t seem to find it. I tried searching the web, but pretty much all mention of that decision appears to have been scrubbed from cyberspace. When I was doing research for a screenplay about 7 years ago I was able to find lots of references to it, but not the actual decision. Now there’s nothing. Sadly I didn’t reference the judge’s name in my screenplay or I’d have it.

      Reply
  2. Jane says

    October 23, 2011 at 12:50 pm

    I’ll back up Christopher on this one, although I didn’t remember the exact age of the little girl or the judge’s name. Yes, a judge described a young child as “sexually aggressive” and let the molester walk without much more than a reprimand. He must have had something going with the judge who maybe disappeared behind a name-change, if he lived that long.

    I don’t have the details at the ready, either, but I may have saved something that queer to my Nazi files that reference the Institute for Sexual Research in Berlin, Pink Swastika and the Kinsey Report (Alfred Kinsey promoted the idea of sex with children, the younger the better, because “a baby is sexual from birth and enjoys it”).

    I’ll look.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Some days there is Justice! When Good Things Happen to Bad People | Christopher di Armani.com says:
    October 19, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    […] I wrote about pedophiles trying to claim they have rights and how “minor-attraction” pedophiles shouldn’t mess with Ted Nugent’s […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to my commentaries

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • New comment: Canadian Gun Laws: A Primer for People Who Don’t Know Much About Gun Laws christopherdiarmani.com/15213/guns/can…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Blake Harvey’s Murder Proves We Don’t Value Children’s Lives christopherdiarmani.com/17398/police/g…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing christopherdiarmani.com/8275/human-rig…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Paul Rogan Passes: The End of an Era christopherdiarmani.com/18908/common-s…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: RCMP Sergeant Douglas Smith appeals conditional discharge for illegal handgun christopherdiarmani.com/2439/police/ab…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite

Most Popular This Week

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • Officer Down: LAPD Officer Fernando Arroyos
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • Officer Down: North Carolina Highway Patrol Trooper John Sumter Horton
  • Florida Police arrest a 12-year-old for farting. Have they lost their minds?

Most Popular This Month

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • RCMP Sergeant Douglas Smith appeals conditional discharge for illegal handgun
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • Florida Police arrest a 12-year-old for farting. Have they lost their minds?
  • Officer Down: LAPD Officer Fernando Arroyos

© 2004–2023 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of writing these articles. If you enjoy my work, please buy me a coffee or two to keep me going!