• Home
  • About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Gun Laws 101
  • FPO Violators
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Hire Me

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Personal Responsibility
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice Denied
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Canadian Mass Murders
    • Firearm Prohibition Orders
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Racism
    • Restraining Orders
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Guns
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Firearms Act
    • Fun Gun Stuff
    • Gun Control
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Target Shooting Competitions
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Police
    • Abuse of Police Authority
    • Filming Police
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Hall of Shame
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Political Antics
    • Political Corruption
    • Social Justice
    • Stupid Human Tricks
    • Union Bay Improvement District
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Property Rights
    • Privacy Rights
    • Self-Defense
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure

Singapore Bans Possession of 3D Gun Blueprints

Published January 7, 2021 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Gun Politics, Guns


On January 5, 2021, Singapore’s Parliament passed Bill No. 44/2020, Guns, Explosives, and Weapons Control Bill, which makes possession of 3D gun blueprints a criminal offence without a licence.

The legislative change is designed to stop unauthorized 3D printing of “major” gun parts but does not apply to accessories that can be fitted to a firearm, such as flash suppressors, silencers or a host of other items.

Bill No. 44/2020 replaces the former Arms and Explosives Act, which already required individuals or companies involved in importing, selling or building firearms and explosives to be licensed, and already included printing 3D firearms.

Unauthorised possession of digital blueprints for manufacture of guns, etc.

13.—(1)  A person commits an offence if —

(a)       the person possesses a digital blueprint for the manufacture of a gun or a major part of a gun on a 3D printer or on an electronic milling machine; and

(b)       the person is not one of the following:

(i)        a person granted a licence to manufacture the gun or major part of a gun using a 3D printer or on an electronic milling machine;

(ii)       a person exempt from this section under section 87, 88 or 89 in relation to that manufacture of the gun or major part of a gun.

Individuals convicted under this new section face a maximum of 12 months in prison, a maximum fine of $10,000, or both. For repeat offenders those penalties jump to 18 months and $25,000, respectively.

Corporate entities convicted under this new section face a maximum fine of $25,000, which doubles for repeat offenders.

Desmond Tan, Singapore’s Minister of State for Home Affairs, when asked how this legislation would be enforced, said the police would rely on tips from the public to identify “potential lone wolves 3D printing guns illegally with intent to cause harm.”

Why bother passing a law nobody really intends to enforce?

For the same reason so many useless laws are passed in legislatures around the world – so politicians can dutifully report they’ve “done something” to keep the sheep safe.

Australia’s state of New South Wales criminalized the unauthorized possession of 3D firearm blueprints in 2015, and in late 2019 U.S. District Court Judge Robert Lasnik ruled posting 3D firearm blueprints online was illegal.

The cat was long out of the bag, though, as innovator Cody Wilson and others posted their blueprints to the internet long before the decision.

You can still find 3D firearm blueprints on many sites the internet and downloading and possessing these files is not a crime in most countries, including Canada.

In Canada, a Firearm Business License (FBL) is required to manufacture a firearm. This includes 3D-printed firearms, says Ministry of Public Safety spokesperson Tim Warmington.

“It is illegal to manufacture or possess a firearm without the appropriate licence and applicable registration certificate. The Firearms Act requires that a business, museum, or organization must have a firearms business licence to manufacture ammunition, firearms, restricted or prohibited weapons, or prohibited devices. A business licence is valid only for the activities specified on the licence.”

“If law enforcement found an individual in possession of a 3D printer-manufactured firearm or parts of a firearm (e.g., magazines, barrels), without appropriate licences and registration, the firearm could be seized and the individual charged,” said RCMP spokesman Sgt. Greg Cox.

On September 20, 2020, a 53-year-old Alberta man had the dubious pleasure of being the first person charged for manufacturing and distributing 3D-printed guns and gun parts. His case has yet to go to trial.

In 2014, the Ministry of Public Safety commissioned an intelligence report on 3D-printed firearms but that tender faded into the black hole of government procurement when nobody bid on the project.

 

-=-=-=-=-

 

From the explanatory section of Singapore’s legislation:

Clause 13 provides for an offence of unauthorised possession of digital blueprints for manufacture of guns.

It is now possible for digital 3D gun technology to be applied in conjunction with an additive manufacturing process (i.e., 3D printing) to make a physical and operative gun. Technology advancements associated with the application of digital 3D models and 3D printers are increasing and cost inhibitors are reducing.

While there are many positive uses of such technology including for medical, scientific and industrial purposes, the same technology can also be applied though for criminal purposes.

Accordingly, clause 13 seeks to ensure that the law keeps pace with technology to effectively protect the community. A person who wants to make a digital 3D gun or a 3D major part of a gun by an additive manufacturing process will need an extra licence to do so.

While the making of a digital 3D gun or a 3D major part of a gun by an additive manufacturing process would constitute manufacturing within the meaning of clause 12, clause 13 makes it an offence for a person to possess a digital blueprint for the manufacture of a gun or major part of a gun on a 3D printer or on an electronic milling machine and the person is either not granted a licence or a class licence to manufacture the gun or major part of a gun using a 3D printer or on an electronic milling machine, or is not exempt because of clause 87, 88 or 89 in relation to that manufacture.

 

You can watch the Q&A session from Singapore’s Parliament here.

Author

  • Christopher di Armani
    Christopher di Armani

    Christopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: 3D Gun Blueprints, 3D Guns, Arms and Explosives Act, Bill No. 44/2020, Cody Wilson, Desmond Tan, Firearm Business License, Singapore

Did you find value in this article?

If you found this article useful or it contained valuable information and you want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee or two.

1. Send an Interac eTransfer to author @ christopherdiarmani.net (remove spaces)

2. Send via PayPal using this link: https://www.paypal.me/ThatLibertyGuy

3. Use your credit card in my online store to support me with a one-time donation, a monthly recurring donation, or an annual donation. See these links for all the details about the thank-you gifts I offer my supporters.

Comments

  1. peter bolten says

    January 8, 2021 at 6:39 am

    is this the country that has big flaring signs at border entry points warning people that possession of any amount any drugs is an execution offense?
    If so, those ‘unlicensed’ blue prints in a handbag might also become a capital offense?

    Reply
    • Christopher di Armani says

      January 8, 2021 at 12:02 pm

      No, at least not yet, Peter. But who knows what tomorrow will bring. Certainly not me.

      Reply
  2. Clive Edwards says

    January 8, 2021 at 11:48 am

    It is insanity to believe that bureaucrats can save a single life by denying others the right to self defence. by licensing that right.. Besides, I can do more damage in terms of self defence with my brass handled hardwood walking stick than some dork with a single shot computer printed pistol. If guns were as common as cars we would likely notice that an order of magnitude more people die due to vehicles than to guns.

    But then the gun mystique would not exist, and governments would need to walk the walk of democracy, not merely talk the talk backed up by armed government agents.

    My aggressive self defence attitude and whatever tools, or lack of tools, that are at hand are all I need to keep myself and my family safe. It helps having a wife who is an even better shot than I am..

    Reply
  3. Gerry Kirkham. says

    January 8, 2021 at 2:21 pm

    Hi Christopher, Beyond the need to keep us updated on firearms issues around the world in general, I pondered the need for an in depth article of something that was happening in Singapore. Although Singapore is said to be a Democracy, it is far more authoritarian than just about and other “Democracy” out there.
    I have had the opportunity to visit and stay in that city a number of time in my life, and it is a very clean, and orderly city. However, don’t you dare spit on the street or sidewalk, or drop any item of garbage, no matter how small. The rules and regulations there are very strict, and an arrest and short stay in the local jail will be accompanied with a few bruises at least, administered by the local police. It is a nice place to visit, and I’ve had the best steak I ever had in my life there, but living there with the heavy intolerance of authority lurking about, it’s not a place to live, unless you are very wealthy. My only surprise in your article, was that they took this long to get around to creating this law. I will admit to not having any idea of the firearms ownership policy there, but I would suspect, again, that unless you are wealthy, you will not be allowed to own firearms anywhere on the Island of Singapore. What is always apparent around the planet, is that most governments fear their citizens owning guns, because when a government steps out of line far enough, there might be a citizen backed correction, which will be far more likely with an armed population. I would also suggest, that unfortunately we might now see how such a thing would unfold, in the armed population nation next door to us. As I suspect one of the first major policies to be updated, will be an attempt to change laws and destroy the Second Amendment!

    Reply
    • Christopher di Armani says

      January 8, 2021 at 7:26 pm

      The “need” for the article was because it interested me, Gerry, same as every article I write. 🙂

      I’m not overly knowledgeable on Singapore’s firearm laws either, but will be investigating in the weeks ahead as from what I could glean from this specific issue, they appeared to be more interested in making sure people were licenced than in cracking down on them.

      Regarding our southern neighbours, yes, Biden’s first order of business will be to attempt to take away the guns. Challenging times ahead, to be sure.

      Reply
  4. Arie Intveld says

    January 8, 2021 at 5:31 pm

    Don’t need no stinkin’ 3D blueprints to make a Saturday night special! The plumbing department at Home Depot will do just fine.

    It’s more than dubious that gangbangers are frantically downloading 3D blueprints or CNC instruction sets for making guns. Just like our OIC-induced gun ban, Singapore has joined the global virtuosity tour by legislating new, vote-mining, vacuous solutions to problems which rarely manifest themselves.

    “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”-Tacitus

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to my commentaries

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • New comment: Canadian Gun Laws: A Primer for People Who Don’t Know Much About Gun Laws christopherdiarmani.com/15213/guns/can…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Blake Harvey’s Murder Proves We Don’t Value Children’s Lives christopherdiarmani.com/17398/police/g…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing christopherdiarmani.com/8275/human-rig…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Paul Rogan Passes: The End of an Era christopherdiarmani.com/18908/common-s…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: RCMP Sergeant Douglas Smith appeals conditional discharge for illegal handgun christopherdiarmani.com/2439/police/ab…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite

Most Popular This Week

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • Officer Down: LAPD Officer Fernando Arroyos
  • Officer Down: North Carolina Highway Patrol Trooper John Sumter Horton
  • OPP Sergeant Jamie Gillespie Pleads Guilty to attempting to intercept private communications

Most Popular This Month

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • RCMP Sergeant Douglas Smith appeals conditional discharge for illegal handgun
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • Florida Police arrest a 12-year-old for farting. Have they lost their minds?
  • Officer Down: LAPD Officer Fernando Arroyos

© 2004–2023 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of writing these articles. If you enjoy my work, please buy me a coffee or two to keep me going!