• Home
  • About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Gun Laws 101
  • FPO Violators
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Hire Me

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Personal Responsibility
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice Denied
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Canadian Mass Murders
    • Firearm Prohibition Orders
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Racism
    • Restraining Orders
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Guns
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Firearms Act
    • Fun Gun Stuff
    • Gun Control
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Target Shooting Competitions
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Police
    • Abuse of Police Authority
    • Filming Police
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Hall of Shame
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Political Antics
    • Political Corruption
    • Social Justice
    • Stupid Human Tricks
    • Union Bay Improvement District
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Property Rights
    • Privacy Rights
    • Self-Defense
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure

David Lametti: Political Interference in Judicial Process or Another Ethically-Challenged Liberal Minister in Action?

Published September 17, 2020 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Guns


The headline from Blacklock’s Reporter, an Ottawa political newspaper, reads “Lametti Cited For Meddling: “Intolerable” Says Fed Judge.” After reading the Federal court decision, I call it an accurate assessment, albeit a  restrained one.

Justice Minister David Lametti’s time limits provision, as written in Bill C-17, An Act respecting additional COVID-19 measures, would allow the Justice Department to “unilaterally interfere” in legal proceedings. Not only is this a really bad idea, it’s also not legal.

The ruling against Minister Lametti comes in Reference re Section 6 of the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19) (CA), released on September 3, 2020, by Federal Court Chief Justice Marc Noël.

Lametti’s Justice Department interference “is incorrect in law and should not be followed,” Justice Marc Noel wrote.

At issue is Minister Lametti’s attempt to dictate the amount of time judges will be “permitted” to hear a case. This ministerial edict was included in Part 2 of Bill C-17, An Act respecting additional COVID-19 measures.

Part 2 enacts the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19), which addresses the need for flexibility in relation to certain time limits and other periods that are established by or under Acts of Parliament and that are difficult or impossible to meet as a result of the exceptional circumstances produced by COVID-19. In particular, the enactment
(a)?suspends, for a maximum of six months, certain time limits in relation to proceedings before courts;
(b)?temporarily enables ministers to suspend or extend time limits and to extend other periods in relation to specified Acts and regulations for a maximum of six months; and
(c)?provides for the transparent exercise of the powers it confers and for Parliamentary oversight over the exercise of those powers.

Federal Court Chief Justice Marc Noël ruled, correctly I believe, that David Lametti’s directive causes far more problems than it purports to solve.

For example:

  • What is the meaning of “under an Act of Parliament” in section 6?
  • Does it extend to the time limits under the Rules or under judgments, orders and directions that have been made by the Court?
  • Does it extend to the Practice Directions made by this Court and, specifically, the lifting of the suspensions of the time periods under Rules, orders and directions made in accordance with the Practice Direction dated June 11, 2020?
  • Was Parliament’s purpose to interfere with the Federal Courts Rules passed under the explicit, special and separate procedure in section 46 of the Federal Courts Act?
  • Was its purpose to invalidate and alter the time limits set in all judgments, orders, directions, Practice Directions and Registry actions such as lifting the suspensions of time and allowing certain proceedings to progress under earlier Practice Directions?

“These questions must be answered in the negative,” writes Chief Justice Noël. “Were it otherwise, confusion and potential harm—surely not desired by Parliament—would result.”

[19]  Beyond this, construing section 6 as allowing Parliament to unilaterally interfere with the management and governance of ongoing proceedings would invade a core judicial function—an especially intolerable invasion given the presence of the Attorney General’s Deputy as counsel and other parties related to the Government of Canada in the majority of proceedings before this Court…

[20]  Another important contextual consideration is that Court orders or directions, when made, are law until set aside. That rule is absolute: orders and directions have full legal effect unless they are specifically amended, ousted or invalidated by later specific court order or direction or by specific legislation (assuming such legislation is constitutional). Section 6 does not provide for a specific ouster, amendment or invalidation of court orders or orders in council that have already been made.

If allowed to stand, this section of Bill C-17 would ultimately benefit only the Department of Justice, a situation Chief Justice Noël found was repugnant to the concept of justice.

 

What are your thoughts? Please let me know in the comments section below.

 

 


Selected Excerpts from Federal Court Chief Justice Marc Noël’s Decision:

[1]  In a letter dated September 1, 2020, the Attorney General of Canada has communicated to this Court, through the Canadian Judicial Council, its position concerning the meaning and application of section 6 of the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19), enacted by An Act Respecting Further COVID-19 Measures, S.C. 2020, c. 11, s. 11. As more fully explained below, this requires an immediate response as the Attorney General’s position contradicts the premise on which the Court has been managing ongoing matters since the beginning of the pandemic and creates intolerable uncertainty.

[…]

[7] This Court has the power to provide directions under Rule 54 in response to a party’s unilaterally asserted position: see, e.g., SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. v. Canada (Public Prosecution Service), 2019 FCA 108. This Court also has the jurisdiction to do so under its plenary power to regulate and address any threat to its practices and proceedings: Fabrikant v. The Queen, 2018 FCA 224 and cases cited therein.

[8] The issuance of a direction under Rule 54 and pursuant to the Court’s plenary power is required in this case. Many judgments, orders and directions of this Court have set time limits. The Attorney General’s position, if correct, would reverse them.

[…]

[10] The uncertainty and confusion created by the position taken by the Attorney General affects the core administration of matters that come before the Court and many of its decisions. In order to clarify the situation for the benefit of all parties, the issuance of a direction under Rule 54 and supporting reasons are required.

[11] The Court directs that the Attorney General’s position concerning the interpretation and effect of section 6, in so far as it extends to the time limits under the Rules and orders made thereunder, is incorrect in law and should not be followed. The Federal Courts Rules, S.O.R./98-106 and this Court’s Practice Directions, judgments, orders and directions remain in full force and effect.

 

Author

  • Christopher di Armani
    Christopher di Armani

    Christopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: An Act respecting additional COVID-19 measures, Bill C-17, Chief Justice Noël, Federal Court Chief Justice Marc Noël, Federal Courts Act, Federal Courts Rules, Judicial Process, Justice Minister David Lametti, Lametti Cited For Meddling, Political Interference

Did you find value in this article?

If you found this article useful or it contained valuable information and you want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee or two.

1. Send an Interac eTransfer to author @ christopherdiarmani.net (remove spaces)

2. Send via PayPal using this link: https://www.paypal.me/ThatLibertyGuy

3. Use your credit card in my online store to support me with a one-time donation, a monthly recurring donation, or an annual donation. See these links for all the details about the thank-you gifts I offer my supporters.

Comments

  1. Dave_C says

    September 17, 2020 at 9:15 am

    Is Lametti attempting to limit the Nova Scotia inquiry into the criminal and criminally incompetent RCMP investigation?

    Reply
    • Christopher di Armani says

      September 18, 2020 at 12:29 am

      I’m not sure, Dave. I need to dig into the reports I’ve seen coming out over the past few days, and that’s on my ToDo list.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to my commentaries

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • New comment: Canadian Gun Laws: A Primer for People Who Don’t Know Much About Gun Laws christopherdiarmani.com/15213/guns/can…
    about 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Blake Harvey’s Murder Proves We Don’t Value Children’s Lives christopherdiarmani.com/17398/police/g…
    about 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing christopherdiarmani.com/8275/human-rig…
    about 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Paul Rogan Passes: The End of an Era christopherdiarmani.com/18908/common-s…
    about 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: RCMP Sergeant Douglas Smith appeals conditional discharge for illegal handgun christopherdiarmani.com/2439/police/ab…
    about 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite

Most Popular This Week

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • OPP Sergeant Jamie Gillespie Pleads Guilty to attempting to intercept private communications
  • Officer Down: LAPD Officer Fernando Arroyos
  • Why the Flood of Firearm Registration Certificates in My Mailbox?
  • OPP Sgt. Mike Dolderman’s Sexual Assault Trial Delayed Again

Most Popular This Month

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • RCMP Sergeant Douglas Smith appeals conditional discharge for illegal handgun
  • Florida Police arrest a 12-year-old for farting. Have they lost their minds?
  • Why the Flood of Firearm Registration Certificates in My Mailbox?

© 2004–2023 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of writing these articles. If you enjoy my work, please buy me a coffee or two to keep me going!