• Home
  • About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Gun Laws 101
  • FPO Violators
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Hire Me

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Personal Responsibility
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice Denied
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Canadian Mass Murders
    • Firearm Prohibition Orders
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Racism
    • Restraining Orders
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Guns
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Firearms Act
    • Fun Gun Stuff
    • Gun Control
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Target Shooting Competitions
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Police
    • Abuse of Police Authority
    • Filming Police
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Hall of Shame
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Political Antics
    • Political Corruption
    • Social Justice
    • Stupid Human Tricks
    • Union Bay Improvement District
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Property Rights
    • Privacy Rights
    • Self-Defense
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure

MP Cheryl Gallant Tables Bill C-222 to Limit Expropriations of Private Property

Published March 12, 2020 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Property Rights


In Canada, property rights are provincial jurisdiction, except when they’re not. There is some federal overlap and overreach, and it’s the overreach Cheryl Gallant addresses in her Private Member’s Bill C-222, introduced to Parliament on February 17, 2020.

To understand how intertwined these issues are, it’s necessary to briefly delve into the history of property rights and the legislative changes and court decisions impacting them.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects individuals and their property from state intrusion in a very limited scope [see Section 8’s search and seizure protections].

Our 1960 Bill of Rights protects the “enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law.”

This is not a constitutional protection, but a federal statute that applies only to the federal government. It can be overridden by another Act of Parliament, as the Department of Veterans Affairs Act, s. 5.1(4) does with respect to interest on veterans’ pensions.

The Supreme Court, in Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General), ruled the government had no fiduciary duty to pay interest to veterans prior to 1990 because the government specifically used “clear and unambiguous language” to limit its obligations to disabled veterans.

The governmental expropriation of property without compensation is discouraged by our common law tradition, but it is allowed when Parliament uses clear and unambiguous language to do so.

The Department of Veterans Affairs Act, s. 5.1(4) takes a property claim from a vulnerable group, in disregard of the Crown’s fiduciary duty to disabled veterans.  However, that taking is within the power of Parliament.

To make matters worse, government expropriation of land without the owner’s consent is not subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it’s governed by the Expropriation Act – which defines the steps the federal government must take before it can confiscate property.

This is where it gets messy.

Provinces generally abide by the common law requirements of compensation for expropriation. The federal government, however, is far less interested in compensating individuals for their losses than it is in seeking ways to take what it wants and levying fines on Canadians in the process.

Two examples are the Fisheries Act and the Species At Risk Act, as this August 2019 excerpt from a Department of Fisheries and Oceans policy statement explains.

The Fisheries Act and the Species at Risk Act provide a legal basis for conserving and protecting fish and fish habitat. The fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act provide a holistic approach to conserving and protecting fish and fish habitat, supported by policies and programs that provide for the long-term sustainability of freshwater and marine resources.

The fish and fish habitat protection provisions of the Fisheries Act include:

    • a prohibition against causing the death of fish, by means other than fishing (section 34.4)

    • a prohibition against causing the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat (section 35)

    • a framework of considerations to guide the Minister’s decision-making functions (section 34.1)

    • ministerial powers to ensure the free passage of fish or the protection of fish or fish habitat with respect to existing obstructions (section 34.3)

It’s the extremely broad interpretation of this “prohibition against causing the harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat” that causes land owners so much trouble.

The act of clearing a blocked culvert on your own land is one example of “disruption” deemed an offence by government officials.

Section 58 of the Species at Risk Act defines similar restrictions.

 

How Bill C-222 Resolves These Problems

That’s a lengthy bit of backstory, I know, but it’s all necessary to understand the Expropriations Act and Cheryl Gallant’s proposed amendment of it through Bill C-222.

The language of the Expropriation Act is not “clear and unambiguous” as the Supreme Court required in Authorson v. Canada, which opens the door for a wide range of property rights abuses.

These are the abuses Cheryl Gallant, Member of Parliament for Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke, seeks to remedy with Bill C-222.

Bill C-222 would add two exceptions to the Expropriation Act to clarify the conditions under which the government can expropriate property.

“There has been a disturbing trend in Canada towards what is referred to as regulatory, de facto or constructive taking of private property. This happens when Government uses its statutory powers to regulate or restrict the property rights of an owner, without acquiring title to the land being adversely affected. The landowner feels the impact of the regulation as if the land has been expropriated,” said Cheryl Gallant, M.P.

The first change is to the Exceptions section, under “Factors not to be taken into account.”

Bill C-222 would restrict the “special circumstances” government can invoke to seize a person’s property and avoid the requirements to give proper notice, hold public meetings and provide compensation.

Special circumstances cannot be the restoration of natural habitat caused by a natural event – whether attributed to climate change or not. These are not circumstances requiring the government to “urgently” abdicate its responsibility to citizens. They are ongoing natural occurrences.

The second exemption would address property the government deems is “urgently required.”

This is the more concerning portion of the Expropriation Act because it allows the government to seize your property immediately – when you have not been compensated or even when no compensation is offered.

It defies logic that we must change the way government expropriates property from us in order to protect our property rights.

“It doesn’t have to make sense. It’s government policy.”

Is Bill C-222 the perfect solution to the issue of property rights in Canada? No, but it’s one important piece of the puzzle that guarantees the rights of Canadians are respected by all levels of government.

 


 

Please watch Cheryl Gallant’s video, below, for her brief overview as she introduced Bill C-222 into the House of Commons, the write or phone your Member of Parliament and ask them to support Private Member’s Bill C-222 when it comes up for a vote.


Author

  • Christopher di Armani
    Christopher di Armani

    Christopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: Authorson v. Canada, Bill C-222, Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Expropriation Act amendment, Fisheries Act, MP Cheryl Gallant, Property Rights, Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke, Species at Risk Act

Did you find value in this article?

If you found this article useful or it contained valuable information and you want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee or two.

1. Send an Interac eTransfer to author @ christopherdiarmani.net (remove spaces)

2. Send via PayPal using this link: https://www.paypal.me/ThatLibertyGuy

3. Use your credit card in my online store to support me with a one-time donation, a monthly recurring donation, or an annual donation. See these links for all the details about the thank-you gifts I offer my supporters.

Comments

  1. RCEME says

    March 12, 2020 at 10:55 am

    The fact of the matter is you are just a guest on this planet and anything you think you own can and will be taken away in one way or another eventually. Remember Democracy is the illusion of freedom. This is nothing new. I have met Cheryl Gallant and believe she is genuine in what is right. Good fortune on this one!

    Reply
  2. Norm Bazinet says

    March 12, 2020 at 11:05 am

    I spent my career as an environmental scientist for the Province of Ontario, I dealt with federal fisheries officers who used the abusive powers of the HADD (Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction of fish habitat – Section 35 of the Fisheries Act). I was limitlessly extatic when Harper deep sixed that part of the Fisheries Act. Then Trudeau got in and put the HADD right back into the Fisheries Act. Now Canadians are abused again by this disgusting legislation. This is one of the foundations of the environmentally religious left. The Liberals will absolutely block Cheryl’s legislation because it threatens the HADD. Her legislation will have to be resubmitted under a Conservative majority.

    Reply
  3. Joe says

    March 14, 2020 at 10:30 pm

    Bill C-222 is not good enough. The whole Expropriations Act needs to be repealed and property rights enshrined. If the government wants a piece of land (or any other property), they should have to pay whatever the owner demands, otherwise it is theft. And no, I don’t care if the tyrants have to reroute a highway around someone whose selling price is not met when that rerouting is cheaper than the price demanded by the owner.
    HOWEVER, I want property rights AFTER the government makes it unlawful for non-Canadians to own Canadian soil (land property).

    Reply
  4. Merv says

    March 18, 2020 at 8:36 am

    Just don’t expect anything good from this government. Just look at their track record.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to my commentaries

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • New comment: Edmonton Police Service Constable Adam Kube Refused Any Appeal In His Termination for Corrupt Practices christopherdiarmani.com/10846/police/p…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • A big shout out to @CandiceMalcolm, @AndrewLawton, @AnthonyFurey and the entire team at @TrueNorthCentre for sendin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 3 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • For earthly princes lay aside their power when they rise up against God, and are unworthy to be reckoned among the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Paul Rogan Passes: The End of an Era christopherdiarmani.com/18908/common-s…
    about 2 months ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • To restore common sense to our nation, this is the path. The political left works around the clock and around the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 2 months ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite

Most Popular This Week

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • The National Anthem BANNED… at Indiana’s Goshen College?
  • A Historic Day for Freedom of Speech: Geert Wilders
  • Constable Adam Massart: Give him the finger, he’ll point his service pistol at you
  • Thank God for Andrew Abbass and his Lawyer

Most Popular This Month

  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • OPP Sgt. Mike Dolderman’s Sexual Assault Trial Delayed Again
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • OPP Sergeant Jamie Gillespie Pleads Guilty to attempting to intercept private communications
  • Escaped Mental Patient William Bernard Lepine and the 1972 Kettle Valley Murders

© 2004–2023 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of writing these articles. If you enjoy my work, please buy me a coffee or two to keep me going!