• Home
  • About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Gun Laws 101
  • FPO Violators
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Hire Me

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Personal Responsibility
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice Denied
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Canadian Mass Murders
    • Firearm Prohibition Orders
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Racism
    • Restraining Orders
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Guns
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Firearms Act
    • Fun Gun Stuff
    • Gun Control
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Target Shooting Competitions
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Police
    • Abuse of Police Authority
    • Filming Police
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Hall of Shame
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Political Antics
    • Political Corruption
    • Social Justice
    • Stupid Human Tricks
    • Union Bay Improvement District
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Property Rights
    • Privacy Rights
    • Self-Defense
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure

DNA Databases, Privacy Rights and Law Enforcement

Published June 26, 2020 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Privacy Rights, Rights


You’ve probably seen the ads for Ancestry.com’s DNA testing. Their pitch, if you’re even slightly curious about your own family history, is compelling:

Uncover your ethnic mix, discover distant relatives, and find new details about your unique family history with AncestryDNA®.

How do you refuse that premise?

My own son-in-law used 23andMe to test his DNA to see if he could find a cousin given up for adoption at birth more than 35 years ago. Using their DNA sequencing service, he learned his long-lost cousin also submitted his DNA to the service, and for the same reason.

If his birth family was looking for him, this long-lost cousin wanted to be found.

A family connection thought lost forever was rekindled.

It’s a beautiful thing.

Over 30 companies offer to examine your DNA to tell you who you are and where you came from. None of them tell you about the potential downside of voluntarily submitting a sample of your DNA to them.

You abandon your right to privacy.

While each company has its own privacy policy and many thought they were inviolable, it turns out those privacy policies don’t stand up in a court of law.

 

US Courts Allow DNA Database Searches

“A Florida state judge has reportedly allowed police to search the entirety of the public genealogy website GEDmatch” writes Cassie Martin in a column for ScienceNews.org.

The terms of the Florida warrant granted police investigators access to GEDMatch.com’s complete database, including records for those who did not give permission to be included in law enforcement searches.

Steve Mercer, the chief attorney for the forensic division of the Maryland Office of the Public Defender, explains why this is a problem.

“People who submit DNA for ancestors testing are unwittingly becoming genetic informants on their innocent family. They have fewer privacy protections than convicted offenders whose DNA is contained in regulated databanks.”

This is a serious blow to privacy rights.

An Irresistible Investigative Carrot

From the New York Times:

For police officers around the country, the genetic profiles that 20 million people have uploaded to consumer DNA sites represent a tantalizing resource that could be used to solve cases both new and cold.

But for years, the vast majority of the data have been off limits to investigators. The two largest sites, Ancestry.com and 23andMe, have long pledged to keep their users’ genetic information private, and a smaller one, GEDmatch, severely restricted police access to its records this year.

 

DNA Assists Capture of the Golden State Killer

The Golden State Killer, who raped over 50 women and murdered at least 13 others, was apprehended after police ran DNA from a series of cold cases through the GEDmatch online DNA database.

Investigators, at their wits end to capture the man who terrified California for over a dozen years, figured they had nothing to lose by uploading the killer’s DNA to GEDMatch and see if anything popped out.

They were probably surprised when their gamble paid off with information about a distant relative. While nobody knows for certain, that relative probably paid for a DNA test through Ancestry.com or 23AndMe.com, the two most popular DNA testing sites, and uploaded it to GEDMatch’s database.

This allowed them to track down the ex-police officer turned rapist and murderer and eventually arrest him.

On April 24, 2018, United States Navy veteran and former police officer Joseph James DeAngelo was charged with eight counts of first-degree murder based entirely on the DNA match investigators found.

The discovery and capture of an infamous serial killer by DNA testing means this technology is an enticing carrot for law-enforcement – one so appealing most police agencies cannot ignore it – especially whe,n in cold cases like the Golden State Killer, there are so few options for solving these crimes.

 

So What’s the Point of This Column?

Awareness.

I want you to know how your DNA could be used, without your permission or even your knowledge, in some circumstances.

Am I against police investigators using DNA to solve cold cases or other difficult-to-solve crimes?

Absolutely not.

I believe police should use all the tools at their disposal to catch heinous criminals like the Golden State Killer, Joseph James DeAngelo.

However, I also believe our right to privacy should not be extinguished simply because we want to learn about our own personal history.

 


Where do you stand on this issue?  Should police be granted access to DNA databases whenever they want? Or should there be strict restrictions on their access given the deeply personal nature of DNA?

Let me know what you think in the comments section below.

Author

  • Christopher di Armani
    Christopher di Armani

    Christopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: 23andMe, Ancestry.com, cold case, DNA database, DNA testing, GEDmatch, infamous serial killer

Did you find value in this article?

If you found this article useful or it contained valuable information and you want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee or two.

1. Send an Interac eTransfer to author @ christopherdiarmani.net (remove spaces)

2. Send via PayPal using this link: https://www.paypal.me/ThatLibertyGuy

3. Use your credit card in my online store to support me with a one-time donation, a monthly recurring donation, or an annual donation. See these links for all the details about the thank-you gifts I offer my supporters.

Comments

  1. Don says

    June 27, 2020 at 9:48 am

    It seems inevitable that you will one day soon be forced to undergo a chip implant in order to buy groceries. Or anything else for that matter. ALL your personal and financial information will be imbedded and as with all “privacy” promises, it will become available to anyone with a scanner and any nebulous ‘need to know.’ Orwell couldn’t have even dreamed up the surveillance society we now live in, wittingly or unwittingly. And there is a high def camera recording you at every intersection in almost all cities and towns. Hell, even your TV and refrigerator (so-called “smart” ones that is) are spying on you.

    Reply
  2. Joe says

    June 27, 2020 at 10:55 am

    Idiots who submit their DNA will get what they deserve. Tyrants who demand mandatory chipping, DNA testing, vaccinations, or handover of private info need to be shot.

    Reply
  3. Fred Ziffel says

    July 4, 2020 at 7:17 pm

    Even if you do not submit your own DNA, if one of your relatives submits theirs, that will be close enough to finger you.

    Reply
    • Christopher di Armani says

      July 4, 2020 at 9:02 pm

      I’ve survived this long without committing a crime (other than thinking unapproved thoughts without government permission), Fred, so what my relatives do with DNA tests doesn’t concern me. 🙂

      In fact, when my brother had one done a few years back, the test confirmed what we’d long believed already, that most of what we were raised to believe about our family heritage was lies. Long story, but that confirmation in and of itself was pretty interesting.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to my commentaries

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • New comment: Edmonton Police Service Constable Adam Kube Refused Any Appeal In His Termination for Corrupt Practices christopherdiarmani.com/10846/police/p…
    about 1 week ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • A big shout out to @CandiceMalcolm, @AndrewLawton, @AnthonyFurey and the entire team at @TrueNorthCentre for sendin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • For earthly princes lay aside their power when they rise up against God, and are unworthy to be reckoned among the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 4 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Paul Rogan Passes: The End of an Era christopherdiarmani.com/18908/common-s…
    about 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • To restore common sense to our nation, this is the path. The political left works around the clock and around the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite

Most Popular This Week

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • Escaped Mental Patient William Bernard Lepine and the 1972 Kettle Valley Murders
  • Edmonton Police Service Constable Adam Kube Refused Any Appeal In His Termination for Corrupt Practices
  • OPP Sergeant Jamie Gillespie Pleads Guilty to attempting to intercept private communications

Most Popular This Month

  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • How Many Uniformed Mall Thugs does it Take to Subdue One Young Woman?
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • OPP Sgt. Mike Dolderman’s Sexual Assault Trial Delayed Again
  • OPP Sergeant Jamie Gillespie Pleads Guilty to attempting to intercept private communications
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?

© 2004–2023 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of writing these articles. If you enjoy my work, please buy me a coffee or two to keep me going!