• About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Blog
  • Contact Me
  • Subscribe

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Conflct of Interest
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Fun Gun Stuff
      • Gun Games
      • Target Shooting Competitions
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Personal Responsibility
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Justice Denied
    • Murder and Mayhem
    • Racism
    • Religious Persecution
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture Laws
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • War on Drugs
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms Breaches
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Individual’s Rights Violations
    • Oppose Bill C-30
    • Personal Privacy
    • Property Rights
    • Right To Privacy
    • Self-Defense
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • Shariah Law in America
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Liberty
    • Canada’s Firearms Act
    • Canada’s Powerful Gun Lobby
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Gun Control Around The World
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Open Carry
  • Police
    • 25 Reasons To Dump The RCMP
    • Abuse of Authority
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Corruption
    • RCMP Misconduct
    • RCMP Wall of Shame
  • Politics
    • Election Antics
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Justin Trudeau

Why do American Doctors want to know if Patients own Firearms?

Published November 15, 2014 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Gun Politics, Personal Privacy


Why-does-my-Doctor-want-to-know-if-I-own-guns

Why do American family physicians want to know if their patients own Firearms before treating them for [insert medical issue here]?

The only doctor who will ask you about gun ownership before treating you is a doctor who hates guns. Any doctor who hunts or target shoots or believes in your Right to Self-Defense isn’t going to ask the question. He won’t care. It’s only anti-gun doctors who believe you must abdicate your Second Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms before he or she will treat you.

There is a single reason for medical practitioners demanding to know if you own firearms before treating you. It’s got nothing to do with medicine and everything to do with politics. Their politics, not yours.

It’s obscene, but that’s the reality. The problem is so bad that two states, Florida and Missouri, have passed a law against the practice, effectively a gag order against doctors prying into that particular area of a patient’s life.

The practice comes out of the Center for Disease Control’s decision that guns are a disease and they must treat ownership of them as a disease.

President Obama, in his gun violence a “public health crisis” rhetoric, announced in 2013 he would fund the Center for Disease Control to “study the issue”, or in layman’s terms, look at ways of stripping people of guns based on a medical model. He also rescinded the 1995 prohibition on using federal tax dollars to advocate and/or promote “gun control”.

“While year after year, those who oppose even modest gun-safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to go ahead and study the best ways to reduce it.”

Daniel Webster, director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research, backed Obama’s anti-gun plans.

“I agree that the CDC should be free to fund high-quality research into the causes and solutions to gun violence, one of the leading causes of premature mortality in the U.S. that affects not only deaths and injuries, but mental health as well.”

The CDC ought to stick to matters of medicine and stay out of social policy. As Emily Miller of the Washington Times noted in her January 2013 column, “Tax Dollars for Gun Control”,

By calling gun violence a “public health crisis” on Wednesday, Mr. Obama echoed Mr. Clinton’s model. It’s a move that could cost lives, as shifting funding away from fighting disease creates severely misplaced priorities. In 2010, 780,213 Americans died from cardiovascular disease and 574,743 from cancer, compared with 11,078 firearm homicides.

Under the Bush administration, the CDC already conducted a two-year independent study of the laws, including bans on specified firearms or ammunition; gun registration; concealed-weapon carry; and zero-tolerance for firearms in schools. The scientists concluded in 2003 that there was “insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.”

The notion that suicidal people denied access to firearms will not kill themselves, statistics on both sides of the border show that to be false.

Then in 1992, writing in another New England Journal of Medicine piece, Kellermann cited an American Journal of Psychiatry study to back up a claim that “limiting access to firearms could prevent many suicides.” Instead, that study really concluded that suicidal people who don’t have guns find other ways to kill themselves.

In Canada as in the United States, while anti-gun forces triumphantly crowed that suicides by gun were down (correct, they were), those same anti-gun forces refused to acknowledge that suicides by hanging grew exponentially for the same time period, and were now higher than the number of suicides by gun they said were “prevented”.

People didn’t stop killing themselves, they simply chose a different method.

To put an end to the practice of harassing patients about gun ownership, Florida passed the “Florida Firearm Owners Privacy Act (FOPA)” which prohibits doctors from asking their patients if they own or possess firearms.

Anti-gun doctors and their associations, like the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to name but two, were up in arms over the legislation, claiming it violated their First Amendment rights.

Doctors claimed that FOPA “will denigrate the practice of medicine” by preventing physicians from “communicating freely with their patients on issues relating to the ownership and possession of firearms.”

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), known for the passionate love of firearms (not!), predictably wrote in their brief to the court,

“there is no disagreement within the medical community that providing patients with information about firearm safety is a valid aspect of preventative care and thus beneficial to public health.”

Utter crap, of course, but that is irrelevant. The ACLU, AMA and AAP believe civilians should be disarmed, and will say pretty much anything to make that a reality.

Fortunately the courts disagree with such nonsense and the 11th Circuit Court specifically upheld Florida’s Firearm Owner’s Privacy Act in Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida.

The essence of the Act is simple: medical practitioners should not record information or inquire about patients’ firearm-ownership status when doing so is not necessary to providing the patient with good medical care. The Act’s harassment and discrimination provisions serve to reinforce these prohibitions.

As suggested by the complaints the Florida legislature received prior to passage of the Act, patients are aware that their answers to physicians’ inquiries will be entered into their medical record, and may fear that their record will be shared with third parties, including, for example, government bureaucrats.

We need not speculate as to the reasons a patient may have for objecting to the sharing of his or her firearm-ownership status, but we note that a patient might be concerned about disclosing to a physician information regarding any number of private topics when such information is not relevant to his or her medical care for similar reasons. For example, a patient may not wish to disclose his or her religious or political affiliations, sexual preferences, or bank account balance to a physician.

The Act merely circumscribes the unnecessary collection of patient information on one of many potential sensitive topics. It does so as a means of protecting a patient’s ability to receive effective medical treatment without compromising the patient’s privacy with regard to matters unrelated to healthcare.

Nothing in Florida law prevents or prohibits doctors from expressing their views on firearms or firearm ownership. Their First Amendment Rights are not infringed, but their ability to violate the Privacy Rights of their patients most certainly is.

As the National Rifle Association stated in their brief to the court in Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida,

“The Firearm Owners’ Privacy Act is another reasonable regulation of the medical practice. It exhorts doctors to stick to practicing medicine when examining patients, rather than pushing their own political agendas, and it protects patients from doctors who refuse to do so.”

Precisely.

Firearm ownership is not a disease, contrary to the irrational believes of some in the Center for Disease Control, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics.

These groups should stick to medicine and stay out of politics.

The American Civil Liberties Union out to protect our rights, not violate them whenever it suits their political agenda.Why-does-my-Doctor-want-to-know-if-I-own-guns

Tags: "public health crisis", American Academy of Pediatrics, American Civil Liberties Union, American Medical Association, anti-gun doctors, Center for Disease Control, featured, Florida Firearm Owner's Privacy Act, Gun Violence, ownership and possession of firearms, personal privacy, right to privacy, suicides by gun, suicides by hanging, Wollschlaeger v. Governor of Florida

Did you enjoy this article?

If you liked this article and want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee. Or two. It's entirely up to you and I'll be very grateful.

.

About the Author

Christopher di Armani is a professional writer and filmmaker who resides in Lytton, BC, Canada, with his wife Lynda, their dog, Tig, and their three cats, Midnight Madness and twins Munchkin and Lucky.

He strives to awaken the passion for liberty that exists inside every person with his words. It is this passion that motivates him in every aspect of his life. He is a strong believer in the most basic of individual human rights, the right of free speech and the right of self defense, which includes the corollary right to acquire, possess and use the tools necessary to exercise those rights.

Comments

  1. edward says

    November 17, 2014 at 4:38 am

    The damned system lies to the people, be it the political, the presstitutes, the bureaucratic, enforcement, the so called legal, academic, religious and every entity in existence.

    It has ben postulated then that it is fair to use the same tactics the left and the system utilize against the people.

    If I was ever asked that question about firearms by a doctor, I would in return ask him why is he inquiring and what is the link between his services and that question?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • @DrJacobsRad I certainly hope so.
    about 15 hours ago
  • @TennantJeff There are plenty of legitimate reasons for using live ammo during a training session. There are no l… https://t.co/oYxUXSbRUl
    about 15 hours ago
  • #NegligentDischarge by police in Queen Street police station. "Rifle accidentally goes off inside Fredericton pol… https://t.co/7zcLkYy6s9
    about 1 day ago
  • #Truth https://t.co/EsXZc3oMoG
    about 2 days ago
  • @Bandreescu_ Congratulations, Bianca! A well-deserved honour!
    about 2 days ago

Most Popular This Week

  • Muslim Mass Murderer Gamil Gharbi’s 30th Anniversary
  • December 6th – A Day Dedicated to Hating Men & blaming them for the acts of one Muslim lunatic
  • Gamil Gharbi Day: a memorial to a lunatic and Canada’s dedication to punishing the people who did NOT commit the crime
  • Gamil Gharbi Day – Because blaming the millions of men who didn’t kill anyone is always in fashion!
  • Heidi Rathjen: gov’t “will have blood on their hands”

© 2004–2019 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of building this project. Add some fuel if you'd like to keep me going!