• Home
  • About
    • About Christopher di Armani
    • Disclosure Statement
    • Code of Ethics
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Gun Laws 101
  • FPO Violators
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Hire Me

Christopher di Armani.com

In Praise of Individual Rights and Freedoms

  • Top 25
  • Big Brother
    • Access To Information
    • Bureaucratic Incompetence
    • Bureaucrat’s Rule #1
    • Censorship
    • Feeding at the Government Trough
    • Lemonade Freedom
  • Common Sense
    • Expressions of Gratitude
    • Good Samaritans
    • Good Stuff
    • In Memoriam — Remembering our Heros
    • Life
    • Personal Responsibility
    • Politically Correct Madness
  • Courts
    • Abusive Prosecutions
    • Civil Forfeiture
    • Human Rights Tribunals
    • Judicial Corruption
    • Justice Denied
    • Justice System Abuses
    • Police Sentencing Double-Standards
    • Prosecutorial Misconduct
    • SLAPP Lawsuits
  • Crime
    • Abuse of Trust
    • Canadian Mass Murders
    • Firearm Prohibition Orders
    • Human Depravity
    • Immigration Issues
    • Racism
    • Restraining Orders
    • Sexual Predators
    • Violent Criminals
    • Wrongful Convictions
  • Guns
    • Concealed Carry
    • Dial 9-1-1 and Die
    • Firearms Act
    • Fun Gun Stuff
    • Gun Control
    • Gun-Free Zones
    • Gun Politics
    • Gun Registration
    • Negligent Discharges
    • Target Shooting Competitions
  • Islam
    • Canadian Islamic Disgraces
    • Islamic Terrorism
    • Radical Islam
    • Sharia Law
    • The Religion Of Peace
  • Police
    • Abuse of Police Authority
    • Filming Police
    • Great Police Officers
    • Officer Down
    • Police Brutality
    • Police Corruption
    • Police Misconduct
    • RCMP Accountability
    • RCMP Hall of Shame
    • Warrantless Searches
  • Politics
    • Elections
    • Ethics in Politics
    • Political Antics
    • Political Corruption
    • Social Justice
    • Stupid Human Tricks
    • Union Bay Improvement District
  • Rights
    • Charter of Rights and Freedoms
    • Constitutional Violations
    • Freedom of Assembly
    • Freedom of Religion
    • Freedom of Speech
    • Property Rights
    • Privacy Rights
    • Self-Defense
    • Unreasonable Search and Seizure

Arthur Topham’s Legal Woes Continue for Daring to use his Right to Freedom of Speech

Published May 6, 2013 by Christopher di Armani Filed Under: Freedom of Speech, Guns, Hate Speech, Human Rights Tribunals


Arthur Topham - Owner of RadicalPress.com[
Arthur Topham – Owner of RadicalPress.com[
From the beginning Arthur Topham’s case puzzled me.

Charging Mr. Topham with “wilfully promoting hatred” under Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada seemed excessive given he already faces charges under Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

What makes Arthur Topham so scary?

In today’s world, where we value “hurt feelings” over our Charter Rights and Freedoms, Arthur Topham is the most heinous of criminals imaginable.

Why?

Arthur Topham dares speak his mind.  He does so under the rational and logical belief his Right to Freedom of Speech, as enshrined in Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, actually means something.

Section 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other means of communication.
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.

Arthur Topham is a publisher.  He runs two websites (that I’m aware of), the Quesnel-Cariboo Sentinel and RadicalPress.com.  On those sites he publishes a variety of material on a variety of subjects, just as I do weekly in Canadian Rights and Freedoms Bulletin and on more regularly here on ChristopherDiArmani.com.

Under Section 2(b) a reasonable and rational person may believe the following:

  • Being a human being, Arthur Topham is included in “Everyone”
  • Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression apply to him because he’s part of “Everyone”
  • As he is a publisher, “freedom of the press” would apply and,
  • As Arthur Topham publishes his website on the Internet he is protected as he uses “other means of communication.”

Sadly, “reasonable” and “rational” have nothing in common with either Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada or Section 13 of the Human Rights Act, both of which render our Charter Right to Freedom of Speech null and void.

How can one be free to speak his thoughts, beliefs and opinions without someone, somewhere, taking offense?

I’m positive someone reading this very article will take offense for reasons I neither know nor care.  But will they be offended enough for me to be charged, like Arthur Topham, for a hate crime?  God only knows.

Here’s the relevant section of criminal law:

319. (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Marginal note:Wilful promotion of hatred

(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

The benefit of being charged criminally is that the Truth is actually relevant.

All of this simply confuses me more when it comes to Arthur Topham’s criminal charge.  Since he has the Truth available to him as a defense, it will make proving a case against him much more difficult.

Here are the defenses to a charge under Section 319(2)

Defences

(3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2)
(a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
(b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
(c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be true; or
(d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada.

Again, these are all reasons why so few criminal hate crime prosecutions are pursued under Section 319(2).  It’s also why those thin-skinned ninnies prefer going after those whose “thoughts, beliefs, opinions and expressions” offend them using Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.  It’s simply easier to harass someone with Section 13.

Bizarrely, the Supreme Court doesn’t believe the Truth should ever be a defense to an allegation of “hate crime.”

Here’s what the morons in overstuffed chairs had to say about the Truth in Sask Vs. Bill Whatcott:

“The discriminatory effects of hate speech are part of the everyday knowledge and experience of Canadians.  As such, the legislature is entitled to a reasonable apprehension of societal harm as a result of hate speech.  The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision.  Truthful statements can be presented in a manner that would meet the definition of hate speech, and not all truthful statements must be free from restriction.  Allowing the dissemination of hate speech to be excused by a sincerely held belief would provide an absolute defence and would gut the prohibition of effectiveness.”

Did you catch that?

“The lack of defences is not fatal to the constitutionality of the provision.”

Even murderers and child molesters have defenses available to them!   Not so the man who dares speak his strongly-held “thoughts, beliefs, opinions and expressions.”

Really, why bother with a trial at all.  Simply charge the person, declare them guilty and send them off to the Gulag.

If Arthur Topham draws a judge with common sense and an understanding of the English language and Topham can prove his “thoughts, beliefs, opinions and expressions” are valid according to one or more of the sections defined under Section 319(3) he will be acquitted.

What really, then, is Arthur Topham’s greatest crime?  He speaks harshly about a particular group of people who fall under the protection of an “identifiable group” and has strongly-held beliefs for the opinions he expresses on RadicalPress.com.

He writes some of the commentary himself, others contribute the remainder. Some of what he writes is offensive, or at least it’s considered that way by some thin-skinned but politically savvy individuals.

Those individuals spend their days, apparently, scouring the internet for little-known websites whose content they disagree with. When they find such a website these serial complainers file complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission under Section 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

When that doesn’t work or simply takes too long, as in the case of Arthur Topham, they push for criminal charges under Section 319(2).

Defending himself from a criminal hate crime charge is both time-consuming and expensive. Arthur Topham needs your help and your support.

Please mail your contribution in defense of Freedom of Speech, payable  to:

Arthur Topham
Attn: Free Speech Legal Defense Fund
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C. Canada  V2J 6T8.

You can also send your contribution via PayPal to support Arthur Topham’s fight against Internet Censorship and “hate speech” laws.  Please go to either http://www.radicalpress.com or http://www.quesnelcariboosentinel.com. The PayPal donate button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site.

Author

  • Christopher di Armani
    Christopher di Armani

    Christopher di Armani is a freedom-loving Amazon bestselling author and current events commentator from Lytton, BC, Canada, who strives to awaken the passion for liberty inside every human being.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags: Arthur Topham, Canadian Human Rights Act, Charter Section 2(b), Criminal Code Section 319(2), featured, free speech, freedom of speech, Hate Crimes, RadicalPress.com, Section 13, Truth is no defense

Did you find value in this article?

If you found this article useful or it contained valuable information and you want to thank me, the best way is to buy me a coffee or two.

1. Send an Interac eTransfer to author @ christopherdiarmani.net (remove spaces)

2. Send via PayPal using this link: https://www.paypal.me/ThatLibertyGuy

3. Use your credit card in my online store to support me with a one-time donation, a monthly recurring donation, or an annual donation. See these links for all the details about the thank-you gifts I offer my supporters.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to my commentaries

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Latest Tweets

Follow @ThatLibertyGuy

Christopher di Armani 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
@ThatLibertyGuy

  • New comment: Edmonton Police Service Constable Adam Kube Refused Any Appeal In His Termination for Corrupt Practices christopherdiarmani.com/10846/police/p…
    about 2 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • A big shout out to @CandiceMalcolm, @AndrewLawton, @AnthonyFurey and the entire team at @TrueNorthCentre for sendin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 4 weeks ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • For earthly princes lay aside their power when they rise up against God, and are unworthy to be reckoned among the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 1 month ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • New comment: Paul Rogan Passes: The End of an Era christopherdiarmani.com/18908/common-s…
    about 2 months ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite
  • To restore common sense to our nation, this is the path. The political left works around the clock and around the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
    about 2 months ago
    Reply Retweet Favorite

Most Popular This Week

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • And the Special Treatment for Spouse-Abusing RCMP members just keeps on coming…
  • No Right to Bear Arms in Canada? You might want to re-check your history.
  • A Historic Day for Freedom of Speech: Geert Wilders
  • The National Anthem BANNED… at Indiana’s Goshen College?
  • Constable Adam Massart: Give him the finger, he’ll point his service pistol at you
  • Whitehorse, Yukon, and its Ongoing Addiction Issues

Most Popular This Month

  • All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing
  • Yvon Mercier: From RCMP Depot Trainer to Double-Murderer
  • OPP Sgt. Mike Dolderman’s Sexual Assault Trial Delayed Again
  • Dale Merle Nelson’s 1970 Murder Spree in Creston, British Columbia
  • How did Live-Streaming Rape Become a ‘Thing’?
  • OPP Sergeant Jamie Gillespie Pleads Guilty to attempting to intercept private communications
  • Escaped Mental Patient William Bernard Lepine and the 1972 Kettle Valley Murders

© 2004–2023 ChristopherDiArmani.com | All Rights Reserved

Close

Buy me a cup of coffee

A ridiculous amount of coffee was consumed in the process of writing these articles. If you enjoy my work, please buy me a coffee or two to keep me going!